Critical Thinking - Standards of Thought - Part 2:
Accuracy: The speaker emphasizes the importance of accuracy in critical thinking. They provide an example where state education departments claimed that all their students scored above the national average, which is statistically impossible. This demonstrates that precision alone does not guarantee accuracy [1].
Precision and Inaccuracy: The speaker highlights that precision can sometimes be misleading or inaccurate. They give the example of stating their height as 42.3 feet, which is a precise statement but blatantly inaccurate. They caution against blindly trusting precision without considering its accuracy [1].
Relevance: The standard of relevance is discussed, indicating that critical thinkers should consider only the factors that are relevant to a given question or problem. The ability to discern relevance involves understanding how different questions have different intellectual demands and adjusting thinking accordingly [1].
Depth: The speaker argues that depth is necessary when dealing with complex questions. Superficial thinking may be appropriate for simple or superficial questions, but when facing complexity, deeper thinking is required. They warn against oversimplifying complex questions with simplistic answers [1].
Complexity and Depth: The speaker encourages exploring the complexities of a question and assessing how well an answer addresses those complexities. They provide an example of the problem of drug addiction, where a simple "just say no" response fails to address the political, psychological, economic, and educational dimensions of the issue. Depth in thinking involves understanding and addressing these complexities [1].
No comments:
Post a Comment